Scott@Mister A’s-San Diego

9.6

2016 vintage. Decanted and tasted immediately. Bigg. Heavy body. Phenomenal and smooth but tight and leaning on you like a predator creditor. Came back to those after 8 hours lounging in the decanter. Now, medium-heavy body with more spices than Marco Polo ever dreamed of. The SQN wines, both white (better than the reds) and red, are eff you wines. They are ridiculous and defy norms, values and expectations. This has 30+ years of top-notch drinking. Great for lamb, turkey, wild game and…yah…boring beef. 12.25.24. — a month ago

Hannah Clark

9.0

Juicy with hints of dried cherries, drinkable 👍🏼 — 4 years ago

Todd Anderson

9.1

Opened up nicely after ~1 hour and drank really nicely. very good dirt+fruit balance that I enjoyed. — 4 years ago

Sipping Fine Wine

9.4

Blend of mostly Syrah with a splash of Petit Verdot, Clairette Blanche, Graciano and Viognier, may vary a bit from year to year. Deep Ruby with purple hues, big aromas of dark fruits, cedar and spice. On the palate flavors of blackberry, plum & blueberry with notes of vanilla, licorice and smoke. Fine tannins, long finish, great mouthfeel ending with fruit, herbs and spice. — 2 months ago

Marc M

9.3

Leather, dirt, rocks, ripe plums. — 3 years ago

Phil Kessling

9.5

One of the most memorable wines ever. First thing I noticed was the color, very pale garnet. Spice and wet dirt on the nose, very little fruit. The palate was amazing: rusted iron and sandalwood. Each sip was more and more compelling. A wine that you want to drink slowly and to savor. Only 1 bottle, unfortunately. — 4 years ago

Brett Rogosin

8.9

Beautiful nose of dark chocolate and cherry. Pretty floral rose element. The tannin structure is still present with nice acidity and a good overall mouth feel. Slight chalkiness still with some oak, wet dirt, dark cherry, and that bitter chocolate coming through again. The chocolate wasn’t expected at all. You can taste the density and body in this wine. It’s quite nice. I’d like another. — 5 years ago

with Brooke

Yash Gala

9.1

Good wine. Didn't have it at the right temperature but it had good potential. Deep, blackberries, noticeable tanins.. — 7 months ago

Scott@Mister A’s-San Diego

8.9

1966 vintage. Last tasted 9.20.23. That bottle was a little "chunkier." This one was more refined. Decanted and tasted nearly immediately and throughout a 2 hour window. Throwing the expected kitchen sink's worth of sed. Color initially seemed lighter, like 30+ year old red Burg but ended up being a tad darker than that. Light-medium body. Earth, summer dirt and Valrhona chocolate in the nose. All this plus dried cherries in the frontal palate finish. Not much to speak of on the back end. Rated that 9.20.23 bottle an 8.8 and this is slightly better. Still...a definite rush to crush this. 11.11.23. — a year ago

K L

9.0

Good showing for a just released wine. Young but opened nicely. Deep and earthy. Lots of Rutherford dirt flavor. Would be good to stock up on to have and age — 5 years ago

with Matt