Jeroen Koenen

9.1

Hmmm… This is not presenting at the best possible way… murky, mossy,…
Is this a fresh bottle…? — 6 hours ago

Bob McDonald

9.0

Brief notes. Showed better than the 2013 vintage we had in December 2021. Quite rich, sweet and fruit driven as well as spicy notes. Tasting more new world in this warm vintage. A good wine without being great. Have the last one in a couple of years ie 2026. — a month ago

Alan Weinberg

9.1

delicious but softer than expected. Fruit pretty. Not very minerally. Diam 10 closure. — 2 months ago

Brada

9.1

Smooth. Not tannic. Even better after being opened several days. Blackberry. — 18 days ago

Sam T

9.2

Really nice. Strawberry. A little earth — 11 days ago

Mary H

9.2

Yeasty bread, ripe and slightly browned Fuji and honeycrisp apple, hint of pineapple. Crisp but not bracing, fine bubbles. — a month ago

Aaron Tan

9.0

For the price, I expected a lot more. So did the rest on the table. Probably too young as it did improve with air, but I’ve had youthful (and cheaper) Champagne’s that performed far better than this. Started off with heaps of pears, bruised apples, and almonds on the nose. The palate was concentrated, juicy and almost too fruity for me (apples and apricot for days!). Air brought about more cut and chalkiness, as well as some floral notes. In short, I expected more depth. I suspect I’m just not a fan of the vintage. Time will tell. — 2 months ago

Damian

9.0

Golden yellow color, fuller body, stone fruit and citrus on the nose. Flavors of nectarine, citrus, nuttiness and brioche. Probably would be better the next day. — 17 days ago

Manchester Sheldon

9.1

Buttery, soft, and very earthy with hay. A hint of mushroom and terracotta. — a month ago

Mathew

9.3

Half bottle — 2 months ago