Wine biz in NYC in 80s. Sucked at sales. Since 1990, a lawyer. Law’s great, but wine . . . 🤩
Opened and double-decanted to remove sediment. Initially, I’m getting a whiff of something off in the nose. Not sure whether it’s brett or a very slight amount of TCA. Underneath I’m detecting some bright, almost confectionery cherry fruit. Palate offers tart dark cherry initially but then leaves a drying impression. I’m going to hold off scoring this for now and update over the next hour as dinner is cooking. (PS - Not sure why this is labeled as a “red blend” on the app as it has to be 100% Pinot Noir as far as I know.)
UPDATE: over the course of three hours, the corkiness has become more obvious. Down the drain. ☹️ — 4 days ago


Deep gold color but still fresh. Lots of “petrol” on the nose and a myriad of other minerals. Some appley fruit as well. Round and mouthfilling, nice intensity and balance. Nice acids for an ‘18 but they’re softening. Bone dry, nice length. — 6 days ago
These are night 2 notes. (On night 1 it seemed a little reduced and had a weird almost-acetate-adjacent note.) But on night 2 it was balanced and clean, if not a bit simple. Nice weeknight cheapie. — 2 days ago
A solid inexpensive vintage port. Drinking it too young but whatevs. I love the deep rich fruit. Not complex and still quite tannic. But nice minerality underneath. I’d like to revisit in 10 years. — 6 days ago


This is Garagiste’s private label. I’m guessing the producer is Icardi because that’s usually their go-to for Barbaresco and Barolo, but I can’t be sure. In any event, this is terrific wine and at its peak, in my view. Nose is classic with rose petals, beautiful dried cherry, mineral-flecked gravel, and some tertiary old library scents making an appearance. Soft, long, and balanced in the mouth. Really fine. Strangely, zero sediment. — 6 days ago
Second bottle of this in the past year. It’s deep, complex, and drinking really well now. A little note of barnyard adds a dimensional to the deep ripe fruit and deep granite on the nose. It’s dry and very deep on the palate. Deep savory and mineral notes are prominent, nicely augmenting the dark fruit. Nice but soft acids. A teensy little bit drying on the finish, so this is definitely designed for the table, where it will shine with stews and braises and pasta and . . . — 10 days ago
Double-decanted about 30 minutes ago. Like the Burg I opened last night, this too is showing a concerning off note in the nose. Doesn’t seem like TCA but not sure what it is. The palate is nice. Tight dark cherry and lots of earthiness. Reserving judgment until I get a fix on the nose as it’s exposed to air.
UPDATE: A couple of hours later, the weird note has blown off, but the wine is not particularly distinguished. So I’m a bit, but not profoundly, disappointed. — 3 days ago

This is a classic example of the warmth of the 2015 vintage in Tuscany. Earthy nose shows dark, ripe plummy fruit, warm terra cotta roof tiles, gravelly earth. Soft and dark-toned in the mouth. The fruit is still there but tertiary notes abound. Tannins plentiful but very soft. At its peak (to my taste). — 6 days ago

This co-op’s village-specific gran seleziones are seemingly always great values and nice weeknight dinner choices. Very classic nose of macerated cherry, and mineral-flecked gravel. Medium-bodied, soft and balanced in the mouth. Flavors tending toward the savory and mineral rather than fruity. Lengthy finish. — 8 days ago
Tom Casagrande
Last bottle of this (of 4). It’s turned into a solid Pessac and in my view it’s close to peaking (though admittedly I tend to favor wines on the younger side than many Bordeaux enthusiasts). It’s for that vaguely-vegetal tobacco-y / cigar box note I like, as well as some nice ripe fruit and some metallic minerality on the nose. Medium-bodied on the palate (surprisingly for an ‘18), and quite dry, but with a lot of cling in the finish. Nice tannins (soft) and decent acids. — a day ago