Scott@Mister A’s-San Diego

9.4

2017 vintage. Preferred this (barely) over the Dakota effort same vintage. More similarities than disparities but the Montana had slightly extra length on the finish. Light-medium/medium body. Almost too pretty and precious for its own good. Almost. $55 USD a bottle resto cost. So many bleeping effing CA cabs but this one is on the short list. 10.16.26. — 15 days ago

KA

9.3

Daniel’s Coral Gables — a month ago

Joe Flo

9.8

Just keeps getting better minimal decanting required. — 2 months ago

Kurt Schuster

9.3

Lush and velvety and plump. It’s hard to say restrained fruit forward but that’s what it feels like. It’s not an overwhelming fruit bomb, but it’s a smack you in the face with just the right amount of subtlety. Good structure, even though you can’t even tell any tans or acid or present, deep like almost inky black color. It’s surprising because I found it light and my wife found it heavy and both are right. It actually did not go with our dinner have an Italian style steak with arugula and Parmesan, that’s not the wine‘s fault it’s me choosing the wrong line. Silken expressive, but I don’t wanna call it constrained more like concentrated expression of the wine versus something dynamic and evolving. Absolutely delicious, but also heady and overwhelming.  — 3 months ago

with Denise

Bob Rodgers

9.5

A beautiful wine by a brilliant producer. Deep purple color. Bacon fat hints with earthy and truffles on the nose that evolve into dark fruits. Soft tannins on the mouthfeel linger to a grapey finish. Excellent — 6 months ago

Kelly Perkins

9.2

Good stuff — 9 months ago

Scott@Mister A’s-San Diego

9.3

2017 vintage. Verry well made. Popping, durty nose. Light-medium/medium bod. Fairly sleek currently. Consume now or within the next 10-spot. My resto cost $55 a bottle which is waay down from the usual expectations. 10.16.26. — 15 days ago

John Hagood

9.0

From MZ. Opened 10/18/2026 with B&P beef. — 13 days ago

Doug Powers

9.0

Blackberry, solid balancing acidity, close to maturity, lingering finish, lovely CCC Zinfandel blend, also shows a touch of noticeable heat (15.2% ABV) in the finish. — a month ago

with Jim

Norman

9.5

Always solid — 4 months ago

Bob Boyle

9.1

Seems to have lost a little crispness over 5-1/2 years but still quite good with long finish — 5 months ago

Scott@Mister A’s-San Diego

9.3

2023 vintage. The least imposing Gap Crown’s Vineyard Pinot I’ve ever had. If you like your California Pinots on the lighter side, this is for you. 3.11.26. — 8 months ago

Thomas Epps

9.3

Still a little tight. Very good, but could use more years in cellar. — 10 months ago

with Jeannie

"Odedi"

9.1

This is a very tasty and easy drinking Zinfandel blend from Sonoma County.

Fruit forward with nice complexity. Elegant and entertaining.

Still young and needs a few years in the bottle to mature properly, and will continue to get better in the next 7 years.

I've had a few vintages of this wine and it is very consistent.

Wine Enthusiasts 92 points.

Good by itself as a sipping wine or with food.

A blend of 67% Zinfandel, 17% Carignane, 8% Petite Sirah, 5% Alicante Bouschet and 3% Mataro.

14.4% alcohol by volume.

91 points.

$36. — 7 days ago

Jammer

9.4

Lucious!!! — 15 days ago

Joe Fischer

9.2

Dark ruby with aromas of dark red stewed fruits, blackberries, baking spices, and red currants. On the bud, it’s smooth and delicious with more stewed fruits and spices. Excellent with our aged ribeye and baked potato. — 3 months ago

John Harding

9.2

Smooth slight pineapple but not too tart. Buttery, but not too sweet. Refined. — 4 months ago

with Jenny

Norman

9.0

Ok. Might need more air that I gave. — 6 months ago

joe mama

9.4

Weeknight treat. Medium body, creme brulee on nose and some custardy finish but great acid. Just so many great things to love in this chardonnay. I still prefer Ma Belle Fille — 9 months ago

William Brouwer

9.0

Full body. Nice nose. Smooth. Enjoying a glass at the Olde Brick House in Rochester, MN. — a year ago