Tom Casagrande

9.3

It’s far from cheap for a Chalonnaise white but it’s very very good. Little discernible oak influence on the nose, which, with some air, gives off increasingly deep pear and ripe apple fruit, along with deep-toned limestoney notes. Great concentration in the mouth, with weighty fruit and deep minerality spilling into a long finish. Medium-low acids. Whether it’s worth the high price tag is debatable, but you can’t deny that it’s quite enjoyable and interesting.

What I’m internally debating is this: At this price point, would I rather have a well-made village or lieu-dit Meursault, or an elite Montagny? There’s a special terroir that comes through with a well-made village Meursault, or Chassagne, or Puligny (or even a good Saint-Aubin or Auxey). And Montagny—even a maxed-out Montagny like this one—won’t have that. (I guess I answered my own question.) — a day ago

David Dorn

9.4

Had tge 2021 vintage very complex very good balance nose and taste — 2 years ago

Jay Eagan

9.6

Red fruit with some spice — 4 years ago

with Kristine

ash

9.0

2022 vintage in SFO. Compelling & affordable alternative to Burgundy — 3 months ago

Ed Ryder

9.6

Wish I had the patience to cellar this but it’s brilliant already. So unique, incredible almost grainy texture and mouthfeels. Sappy and vibrant on the one hand but deep and savoury. Lovely stuff. — a year ago

Jean-Phillippe Landry

9.3

Beautiful wine, chardonay but not. — 3 years ago

Brendan Baker

9.1

Raspberry, med - body, high acid, pure and fresh ✨ — 4 years ago

JKT

9.1

Yes a nicely proportioned lively CdP that is complex — 4 months ago

Kevin Løk

9.3

All the way from Jura! Thanks @Brendan Devine! — 4 months ago

with Caroline

Peter van den Besselaar

9.2

Vintage 2010 | I find this beautiful, smoky smell, vibrant taste, but acquired taste i guess… paired with scallop on samphire — 3 years ago