Jessie Vander

9.0

Rheingau.
Mulling spices, orange peel, clove, leather — 9 days ago

CC

9.0

An excellent Riesling, I personally did not find it overwhelmingly acidic. Very nice — 4 months ago

Pinotman /// Andreas

9.3

This Scheu is excellent. Some kind of a cross of Riesling and a wild vine by Georg Scheu in 1916 hence the name. Highly aromatic but more green than a Riesling less depth and build more for easy drinking even for this wine coming from old vines. Tastes a little bit like a Sauvignon Blanc. Passionfruit, hint of Pyrazines aka Grapefruit found in the New Zealand Savs’s. 🍋 Lemon. 12%. — 10 months ago

Martin Bergo

9.1

Always crisp and elegant! — 3 years ago

Jesse

9.4

Heerlijke biologische frisse wijn, vol van smaak en wat diep gele kleur met een klein bubbeltje. — 24 days ago

Peter Sultan

9.2

.375ml bottle. Might have got swamped by several previous bottles, including an aged spatlese, making it taste more simple than it really is. Has laser intensity to its goldenrod, marigold Apple & crème brûlée palate. Under 20$ too. — 5 months ago

with Owen

Sam Friedland

8.9

Nice sweetness. — 2 years ago

Matthew Cohen

9.1

Nose: bright. Lovely. White and yellow flowers. Pink grapefruit.

Palate: on the sweet side. Nice peach. Solid. Mountain stream. Sort of lovely if not not brilliant.

Northwest — 4 months ago

Jeremiah Diaz

9.2

Medium straw in color; honeysuckle and lemon zest on the nose; high acidity; tastes like lemons, lemon peel, and saline with a long finish. — 8 months ago

Aaron Tan

9.3

Followed this wine across three days, and I’d say it was an excellent example of Roseneck. Poured out with a mostly bright green-yellow colour, with touches of light golden hue on some angles in the light.

On day 1, it had aromas of flint, sea spray, apples, fresh honey, and a touch of petrol. Palpable minerality on the palate, almost painfully so. Not the weightiest, but it sure had intensity. Notable sparkly acidity.

On day 2, I had an 08’ Schlossberg to compare with and this was clearly the more filigreed of the two. The 09’ Roseneck was lighter, more mineral, and less complex. It felt greener even - perhaps it was picked earlier in light of the warm vintage. Comparison aside, the nose evolved a little from day 1, with the petrol hints disappearing altogether, the honey note becoming more like honey candy instead of fresh honey, and the appearance of white florals. The palate was again sparkly, with a palate-staining minerality.

I felt day 3 was the best showing of the 09’ Roseneck, with the fruit and floral notes taking a back seat, and the salinity just dominating. Notably, it looked fresher than the 08’ Schlossberg on this day. The palate was just all about that sea spray. The palate was wild - tasted a lot like salted limes doused with fresh honey. The finish was super mineral with hints of lime zest and green apples. Just pure energy!

I’ve seen quite a number of tasting notes on CL noting that the 09’ Roseneck’s possibly close to its peak but I’m inclined to believe otherwise. — 10 months ago

with Michelle