Wine biz in NYC in 80s. Sucked at sales. Since 1990, a lawyer. Law’s great, but wine . . . 🤩
I opened a nice red burg on a weekday evening to honor a friend from work who passed. He and I talked about Burgundy a lot.
The color is fairly light but the nose leaps out of the glass with limestoney-inflected moist gravel, deep ripe, oozing cherries, and a musky floral note. Richly flavored on the palate, but light in texture. Excellent acids. Stony mineral and saline notes in equipoise with the fruit. Fairly chiseled in texture, with super soft tannins in the background. Lengthy finish. Superb. Here’s to you my friend. — 5 days ago
Surprised how much I like this! I’m not a fan of Argentine Malbec, as a rule. But Cab Franc? Different story. Nose has graphite, roasted herbs, walnut husks, dark cherry. Mouthfilling and soft, this is deep and balanced. Very old world impression from this. — 10 days ago
Truncated notes. Delicious. Still a lot of fruit, tannins resolving. Nice balance flavor intensity and great length. — 18 hours ago
I don’t know that Ridge has ever done an early release, inexpensive blend of leftover odds and ends like this. It’s 59% Zin, 18% Carignane (a/k/a “Kerrigan” 🙂), 13% Petite Sirah, and 10% Cabernet. Nose is juicy/ fruity right out of the gate with Zin blackberry augmented with red berries. Palate balances the fruitiness with a loamy gravel note. There’s a bit of youthful but soft tannin, and decent acidity. I’m detecting some RS that I wish was not there, but this would sure be a crowd pleaser at a cookout with burgers or pizza night. Nice for $20! — 3 days ago

A botanical amaro made with Nebbiolo and Barbera. Intensely herbal and rooty nose, with ripe fruit underneath. So aromatic. In the mouth the botanicals hits first, then ripe fruit, and in the finish the botanicals make a reprise. Slightly sweet. Unique and delicious. . — 10 days ago
Second bottle in a month. My September notes largely apply. I wouldn’t leave those much longer. Enjoy soon!
UPDATE: This was better on night 2 (easily a 9.2) and held solid on night 3, so maybe my initial reaction to drink up is a bit alarmist! — 12 days ago
This is the Roussanne not the Albariño. Intense nose with loads of waxy lanolin scents, maybe beeswax, over lightly bruised orchard fruit. If this were served blind, I would almost certainly say Loire Chenin. Scents carry over to the palate. Decents acids for a Roussanne. Distinctive. Purchased at the winery 2 years ago. — a day ago
A lot riper and jammier than the ‘22 iteration. Too much so in my view. Nose has lots of deep, oozing dark berry fruit. A little warm caramel and a spirity note. Jammy and a bit hot in the mouth. Low acids and a shortish finish. — 7 days ago
This capped off a Tuscan red tasting dinner that went by too fast to really take any notes (the 2019 Tenuta Colonna Bolgheri Superiore and 2016 Tenuta Di Sesta Brunello were standouts). This freakin rocks, not super sweet but with such richness and complexity. Sneaky zingy acids buoy it all up. Ridiculous finish. Wowza. — 8 days ago
Tom Casagrande
Truncated notes. Not as ripe as expected. “13 2/3%” alcohol (who puts fractions on a label?). Reminded me of a tannic Pomerol from a not too ripe vintage. Rustic mouthfeel. — 18 hours ago