Consistently good — 6 months ago
Deep and dark. Good but very rich and complex. — a year ago
Apple, lemon, dried apricot, honey and oak. Good balance and minerality. — a year ago
Good but still not our favorite. — 2 years ago
Wonderful berry and some vanilla - delicious!!!!! — 3 years ago
Red and blue fruit, plum and spice, syrupy but smooth body with modest bite in the finish — 4 years ago
Enjoyed 2023 vintage on April 28, 2026. Nice and smooth. — 2 months ago
Good! Nice and not overly tanic or jammy — 6 months ago
Hadn’t had this in a while. Staple for lower price. — a year ago
Nero d’avola would get again. Surprised by this given how young! — 2 years ago
Good but not great. Would get again but others are better for the price. Bright and lighter. Still some oak. — 4 years ago
Very good! Would get again. — 5 months ago
Consistently good. Earthy and stocky but not too heavy or tanic. Cherry on the finish. Very pleasant and would get again. — 6 months ago
Good but darker fruit and notes. Less so than the alchimie back to back — a year ago
The wine poured a beautiful dark Brick/blood red. We decanted it and let it breathe for about 45 minutes first. It has wonderful flavors of earth, graphite, dried fruit. This is another example I think of buying a lower cost wine from a great vintage and putting it up. It certainly could’ve Aged longer. But it went perfectly with our prime stakes dinner at Hanna with our friends the Swanson‘s and the Bailey‘s. #bordeaux #leftbankbordeaux #margauxwine — 2 years ago
Drank back to back to continue. Pleasant and fruity but earthy. Well balanced. Best of their Pinots and hopefully not just the vintage. — 3 years ago
Not bad but definitely fruity. Opened and was enjoyable. Good for the price. Would get again for that reason but also could skip in favor of something else. — 4 years ago
K L
Light and pleasantly fruity. — 23 days ago