We use cookies for analytics and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by closing this message box or continuing to use our site. To find out more, including how to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy.
fleshy at its 14,5% and so primarily fruity and fresh; this is a good spot) for vines and they handled the metier perfectly. Deep gravel/almost chalky and embedded clay make this depth. The fleshy opposite to the watery/cranberry style. A modern classic on a side — 6 years ago
No. The cork smelled of TCA after being pulled, but the wine itself played tricks on us: sometimes there was a whiff of TCA, but then it disappeared, only to reappear later. It did not help that the wine was reductive and sometimes reduction overpowered everything else. However: 1) the cork taint did not become more prominent over time; 2) it did not linger on the palate in the aftertaste. I was sharing this bottle with two friends: one said that the wine was 100% corked and marred by it, and the other was convinced that it wasn’t. I’m on the fence. It still was a beast of a wine though. @MaJ CappS
@Riddley Walker Ugh. I had 3 bad bottles in a row at a tasting with my old wine pal. Sadly, I had smuggled them all back in a suitcase from Chile, and these were all garage type wines.. TCA on one, Brett on the other two.
ie
fleshy at its 14,5% and so primarily fruity and fresh; this is a good spot) for vines and they handled the metier perfectly. Deep gravel/almost chalky and embedded clay make this depth. The fleshy opposite to the watery/cranberry style. A modern classic on a side — 6 years ago