
2023 vintage. Light-medium body. Lacking the follow-through of the 222 selfsame offering. 7.8.26. — 10 hours ago
2022 vintage. Last tasted 2.16.26 (9.0) and 5.6.26 (9.2). This is underrated bleep and covers a ton of white Burg ground. Need to purchase mas. 7.1.26. — 7 days ago
2013 vintage. 6.24.26. — 7 days ago


2024 vintage. Medium/medium heavy body. Not nearly as brusque/dark-fruited as the excellent 2023 but still deliciously delivers. A tad more initial richness this go round. Price still $15.10 a bottle resto cost. 7.8.26. — 10 hours ago
2021 vintage. Medium body. Compact and muscular. No diversions currently. 7.8.26. — 11 hours ago
2018 vintage. From magnum. Last tasted 3.19.26 (9.4), 12.5.25 (9.4), 1.31.25 (9.4) and 10.26.23 (9.5). Decanted and tasted after one hour. Yeahhh. 7.1.26. — 7 days ago
2025 vintage. $17 a bottle resto cost. Yeah, that's all. Underpriced and underrated. Two cases please and that'll last us 1.25-1.5 years. 7.8.26. — 10 hours ago
2020 vintage. Medium/medium-heavy body. All the ingredients there but not in proportion. Disjointed currently. Maybe in another year but possibly not? 7.8.26. — 10 hours ago
2003 vintage. Opened and decanted without issues or concerns. Used a Durand to open and cork was in great shape. Tasted after 30 minutes. The usual light-medium body. Plenty of polish at the 20+ year marker with unanticipated, ruff splash of chunkiness on the finish. Approx 4-5 years away from the absolute, top of the bell curve now but, given the pedigree, could possibly absorb that timescape another 5-spot and I wouldn't argue. Drink now or later. Either or. Ain't gonna disappoint unless you swing exclusively on Napa mountain fruit vines. 7.1.26. — 7 days ago
Scott@Mister A’s-San Diego
2023 vintage. Medium body. No distinctive attributes. Clocking in and out for work but conspicuously and consistently unavailable when needed. 7.8.26. — 10 hours ago