My tasting notes disappear. Doh! Now it's several weeks later. I had the Mondavi reserve just before this so it's not really fair in my opinion. This one had more fruit and not as well put together as the 2004 Mondavi. But it's still really good. I would say between a 9.1 and 9.2
My tasting notes disappear. Doh! Now it's several weeks later. I had the Mondavi reserve just before this so it's not really fair in my opinion. This one had more fruit and not as well put together as the 2004 Mondavi. But it's still really good. I would say between a 9.1 and 9.2
Jun 12th, 2017At regusci. This is the Angelo.
2007: 9.2 or above. Dark dry but good fruit. Tobacco, 2009: significantly diff than the 2007. Much sharper. 2012: I like this better than 2009. It's smoother. I like it. 9.2 I think this could age well. 2013: she gave us one more. This is smoother than the 2012. But flatter. 2012 has more character. Bought two of the 2012
At regusci. This is the Angelo.
2007: 9.2 or above. Dark dry but good fruit. Tobacco, 2009: significantly diff than the 2007. Much sharper. 2012: I like this better than 2009. It's smoother. I like it. 9.2 I think this could age well. 2013: she gave us one more. This is smoother than the 2012. But flatter. 2012 has more character. Bought two of the 2012
Nov 23rd, 2016