Not very good. Metallic aftertaste. Pretty carelessly made with no respect to the fruit. It's super cheap though, so it may be right for some.
Not very good. Metallic aftertaste. Pretty carelessly made with no respect to the fruit. It's super cheap though, so it may be right for some.
1 person found it helpfulMar 1st, 2014Transparent ruby. Simple red currant nose. High acidity, light-bodied (much lighter than the alcohol level suggests), simple and short. Not much going on here. 2012 vintage. 14,5 abv.
Transparent ruby. Simple red currant nose. High acidity, light-bodied (much lighter than the alcohol level suggests), simple and short. Not much going on here. 2012 vintage. 14,5 abv.
Oct 23rd, 2016I would call it "pretty good." I can't remember what I paid... if it was close to $10, I would buy again. But if $20, not worth the money.
I would call it "pretty good." I can't remember what I paid... if it was close to $10, I would buy again. But if $20, not worth the money.
Jan 31st, 2017Thin, watery, no development or flavors. Weak bouquet. No improvement after immediate aerating or 12 hours decanting. Would not recommend.
Thin, watery, no development or flavors. Weak bouquet. No improvement after immediate aerating or 12 hours decanting. Would not recommend.
Jan 28th, 2017nose shows candied cherry, some cinnamon, animal funk, spice, faint cedar and leather.
flavors of charcuterie, mushroom, black cherry, fig, cedar, earth. fruit and funk- lacking the chocolately roundness of many cali pinots.
nose shows candied cherry, some cinnamon, animal funk, spice, faint cedar and leather.
flavors of charcuterie, mushroom, black cherry, fig, cedar, earth. fruit and funk- lacking the chocolately roundness of many cali pinots.
Sep 8th, 2016