Nose a little dull. Palate was better w/ dark fruit, fig with a hint of spice and earth.
Nose a little dull. Palate was better w/ dark fruit, fig with a hint of spice and earth.
Feb 24th, 2017
The 2005 vintage in 2017 is a medium body wine that's pleasantly warm on the palate. Subtle notes of oak can be detected somewhere through the lingering tannins. The wine is well structured and tastes of raspberry, vanilla, and spice.
This wine at the present age has fine sediments that may be partially suspended. Pour carefully to avoid sediment in the glass. If the bottle has been disturbed, consider pouring through an organic unbleached coffee filter into a decanter to reduce suspended sediment.
The 2005 vintage in 2017 is a medium body wine that's pleasantly warm on the palate. Subtle notes of oak can be detected somewhere through the lingering tannins. The wine is well structured and tastes of raspberry, vanilla, and spice.
This wine at the present age has fine sediments that may be partially suspended. Pour carefully to avoid sediment in the glass. If the bottle has been disturbed, consider pouring through an organic unbleached coffee filter into a decanter to reduce suspended sediment.
Sep 4th, 2017
Way underrated, cherry leather nose, smooth peppery finish, prime time!
Way underrated, cherry leather nose, smooth peppery finish, prime time!
Mar 31st, 2017
The 2007 vintage was ok. I would rate it above a table wine but not much further. Although, for a blend, it was acceptable
The 2007 vintage was ok. I would rate it above a table wine but not much further. Although, for a blend, it was acceptable
Dec 31st, 2014
It's a funky blend, and ends up being pretty flat and nothing really stands out. Maybe it was better a little younger?
It's a funky blend, and ends up being pretty flat and nothing really stands out. Maybe it was better a little younger?
Nov 30th, 2013
Napa Valley, California, USA
