I mean, I sit with this wine for the 10th sip and still I think, it is too matured, too old, it has no structure anymore.
I bought the same vintage twice, I didn't wanna believe.
No apparent defects, but the color is pale, try to smell anything on the nose and you'll come short and the mouthfeel? Well...any Sangiovese beats it.
I am sure, it is just bad luck, but I can only suggest to stay away from the 2009 vintage — 6 years ago
a nice one — 7 years ago
its smoky aftertaste, its deep red appearance and the strength with which it covers your mouth and your thoughts clears your mind for a new year. — 6 years ago
I am blown away! It is a great cuvee. Starts off like a strong rabbinic wine and then explodes in the mouth with four and flavors to let you crawl for more. — 6 years ago
it is not fair to rate it after it has been more than 20 years in a cupboard in any 30 °C even summer.
It still has been a wine when I opened it and its color was deep, beautiful, still red. Also the first sip was great, then it just got fell apart. — 7 years ago
Great wine! — 6 years ago
strong character, in our days it is called a wine for meditation, in my days it is been called one to get pissed — 6 years ago
Excellent. I had it with bruschetta, cheese and tomato. — 7 years ago
I shouldn't order important wines from a wanky wine e-shop.
Terrible, I poured it out — 7 years ago
No sugar. Sounds good...
It's colour is pale, transparent and clear. The perlage starts strong first, but then stops almost completely.
I can't detect anything on the nose. Fruity maybe and the minerals caused by the dioxide. I came to this part and there definitely are no bubbles in it anymore.
Dry and fresh sip, plain though.
On the label it is professional. I see indication that it's hand picked, naturally, family owned farm, but unfortunately the wine is nothing for me. — 6 years ago